Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1983No. 13092PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was charged as a persistent offender with burglary in the first degree. The trial court found he was a persistent offender. A jury then found him guilty of the offense. The trial court fixed his punishment at imprisonment for 25 years. The defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence. The record presents overwhelming proof of his guilt. On appeal he contends two reversible errors were committed in the prosecution of the charge against him.

His first point is that the state did not introduce sufficient evidence to warrant a finding beyond a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State v. StrubbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. State v. CobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Christopher X. Bohlen v. Paul D. Caspari William WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. CullenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. BohlenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API