Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Armitage

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 2, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

The defendant in this case has, by his answer, objected to the complainant’s right to relief in a court of equity, praying the benefit of a demurrer, ánd the first question to be settled is whether the complainant, on the case as disclosed by the bill and proofs, presents a demand of a legal rather than an equitable nature. I intimated at the hearing my doubts as to the existence of an equitable basis of suit, and on further consideration these doubts are confirmed.

As now presented the case is substantially one where the complainant seeks a decree against the defendant solely for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Conlan v. RoemerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  3. Smith v. DuffySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. National Investment & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. MandelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SussmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Zuckerman v. GellerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  5. Furlong v. Housing Authority of NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API