Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hertz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an accounting proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated December 11, 1985, which, inter alia, directed that the executor pay part of the attorney’s and accountant’s fees from his commission.

*781Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances herein, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it set aside a settlement of the estate by agreement and ordered that the executor pay a part of the attorney’s and accountant’s fees from his statutory commission (SCPA 2110, 2307;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SchaichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. In re the Estate of MarriNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of VerplanckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Estate of LanyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. In re the Estate of ZorekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. In re the Estate of WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. In re the Estate of ShenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API