In re the Estate of Zorek
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an accounting proceeding, the coexecutor Henry Wimpfheimer appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Laurino, S.), dated December 17, 1985, as fixed his fee for acting as the attorney for the estate at $2,000 and directed him to reimburse the estate in the sum of $9,338.72 representing excess legal fees received.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, the court did not abuse its discretion in sua sponte reducing the legal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Estate of SchaichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re the Estate of MoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Estate of HertzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of VerplanckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Estate of LanyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Estate of WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re the Estate of ShenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Stortecky v. MazzoneNew York Supreme Court · 1992