Legal Opinion
Stich v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 8, 1983No. Civ. A. 78-746PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A.. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., and the Swine Flu Act, 42 U.S.C. § 247b. Plaintiffs, Mrs. Miriam and Dr. Ernest Stich, seek to recover damages allegedly suffered as a result of a swine flu inoculation which Mrs. Stich received on November 18, 1976, pursuant to the national immunization program undertaken by the federal government. See The National Swine Flu Immunization Program of 1976, Pub.L. 94-380, 90 Stat. 1113. Specifically, Mrs. Stich contends that she contracted either…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jakubowski v. Minnesota Mining and ManufacturingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- In re Swine Flu Immunization Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
- Szczytko v. Public Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Caputo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ernest Stich and Miriam Stich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984