Legal Opinion
Szczytko v. Public Service Coordinated Transport
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 29, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
21 N.J. Super. 258 (1952)
91 A.2d 116
HENRY SZCZYTKO, ANNA SZCZYTKO, AND EDMUND J. SZCZYTKO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATED TRANSPORT, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND IRVING LEVIN AND ABE LEVIN, PARTNERS TRADING AS L. & M. EXPRESS CO., AND PAUL MARINO, JR., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued July 28, 1952.
Decided August 29, 1952.
Before Judges DANIEL J. BRENNAN, McLEAN and EWART.
Ernest Fasano argued the cause for the appellants (Quinn, Doremus, McCue & Russell, attorneys).
Abraham I. Harkavy, argued the cause for the respondents…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Kaufman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Callahan v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Oelschlaeger v. Hahne & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Peff v. PeffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Branstetter v. GerdemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Mijon v. AcquaireNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Turner v. McGeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Wilkerson v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Stich v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983