Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Scheffer & Rossum Co. v. Kane

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1919No. 21,664PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Upon the relation of Scheffer & Rossum Company the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to Henry Kane, justice of the peace, and others, to review garnishment proceedings had before the justice.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

An action with an accompanying garnishment proceeding was duly commenced before a justice of the peace. The garnishee, though duly served with the summons, failed to appear, and default judgment was rendered against him in the amount of the recovery against defendant in the action. Thereafter the garnishee, upon affidavits tending to excuse the default, moved the justice to be relieved therefrom, with the privilege of making proper disclosure. After due hearing the justice by formal order denied the motion. The garnishee then sued out a writ of certiorari from this court to review the order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Wischstadt v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. HanftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ausdemore v. Catholic Welfare Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Aastad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API