Aastad v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The only issue on this appeal is a legal one which may be stated as follows: Will certiorari lie to review a county ditch proceedings of a county board where the ditch code itself (Minn. St. 106.631) expressly provides for review of such proceedings by appeal?
Petitioner, Bennie Aastad, in his statement of facts says that he owns a 40-acre tract of farmland and represents, as a class, others owning 31 forties, all situated on and assessed for the construction of County Ditch No. 60, which was constructed long prior to commencement of proceedings to establish County Ditch No. 68.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Saxhaug v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Alden v. County of ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Leyde v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Kunze v. White Bear Lake Police Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016