Legal Opinion

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1908No. Nos. 15,523—(234)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Action in the district court for Wilkin county to have a judgment entered in justice court against plaintiff as garnishee declared null and void. The case was tried before Flaherty, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law ordered judgment in favor of defendant. From an order overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and to set aside the findings of fact, conclusions of law and order for judgment, it appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The respondent, Pierce, brought an action in the justice court at Breckenridge, Minnesota, against R. E. Blunk to recover the sum of $58.92 claimed to be due for goods sold and delivered. On the same day the plaintiff filed an affidavit in garnishment, reciting that he believed that the appellant, the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company, then had property,'money, and effects belonging to the defendant Blunk in its possession and under its control amounting to more than ten dollars, and that it was indebted to the said Blunk in a sum exceeding ten dollars. On the same day…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kellerman v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Knudson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Johnson Motor Co., Inc. v. CueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Roinestad v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API