Legal Opinion

People v. Regalado

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1980No. Crim. 19228PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOSSEE, J. *

On appeal from a judgment of conviction for burglary, defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the upper term under the determinate sentence law. In particular, it is argued that the court erred in allegedly failing to consider as a circumstance in mitigation (1) that defendant was addicted to narcotics, and (2) that defendant exercised caution to avoid harm to the victim. Lastly, defendant urges that his credit for time served be modified to reflect an accurate computation of one day credit for each two days actually served. We conclude…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. RamosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BejaranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. People v. SalazarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. In Re SpearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. LambethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API