Legal Opinion

People v. Salazar

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1983No. Crim. AO16656PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINBERG, J.

Rafael Salazar appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts each of assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245), assault with intent to commit rape (Pen. Code, § 220), and false imprisonment (Pen. Code, § 236), and one count of rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)). He contends that: (1) the trial court erred by failing to instruct that resistance by the victim was an element of rape; (2) evidence of prior offenses was erroneously held to be admissible; (3) the trial court erred in its evaluation of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. HastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. CiceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. KeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API