Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 2006No. 457PA04PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

For the reasons stated in State v. Markeith R. Lawrence, -N.C. — , - S.E.2d — (2006), we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to defendant’s seven convictions for second-degree sexual offense. However, the portion of the Court of Appeals opinion finding no error in nine of defendant’s convictions as specified in that opinion remains undisturbed. Pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004) and State v. Allen, 359 N.C. 425, 615 S.E.2d 256 (2005), defendant’s case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for resentencing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Randolph County v. CoenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BullockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. BrigmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API