Legal Opinion
Pinkston v. Carter
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 1959No. 2349PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Acting Judge.
On a traverse to the answer of a garnishee there was a trial, and plaintiff was awarded judgment. Garnishee brings this appeal.
Plaintiff had sued and obtained judgment for $1,286.50 against Holiday Homes, Inc., for breach of a building contract. On that judgment he issued an attachment against Jack Pinkston, the attorney who had appeared for defendant. Mr. Pinkston moved to quash the attachment and also answered the interrogatories exhibited to him by denying that he had in his possession any money, property or credits of the judgment defendant. After certain motions and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pitman v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1955
- Haverhill Shoe Novelty Co. v. Leader Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
- Kansas City Packing Co. v. HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1893
- Keane v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
- Pritchett v. . TolbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. MiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Gomez v. GomezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Gomez v. GomezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Nicholas M. Carter, Ruth A. Carter v. Jack Pinkston, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963