Legal Opinion

Piazzek v. Drainage District No. 1

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1925No. 25,906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This is an appeal from an award of damages allowed by appraisers in the condemnation of property by a drainage district.

On October 27, 1920, drainage district No. 1 of Jefferson county condemned the milldam of J. M. Piazzek, located near Valley Falls. Upon application of the drainage district the judge of the district court appointed appraisers to appraise the damage. The appraisers filed their report, appraising the damage at $500, and on November 6 Piazzek appealed from the award to the district court. On January 21, 1921, Piazzek died.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Kansas State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Cities Service Gas Co. v. Riverside Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Meek v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Garden City Company, a Corporation, and United States Irrigating Company, a Corporation v. Charles BentrupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Webb v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API