Legal Opinion

Webb v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1927No. 27,335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover for gravel taken from the Neosho river to be used on public roads in Neosho county. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The cause was tried without a jury, and findings of fact and conclusions of law were made as follows:

*39“The issues submitted to the court in this case pertain to the navigability of the Neosho river. If the court finds under the facts submitted and the law that the Neosho river is a. navigable stream then and in that event the judgment and verdict must be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Wood v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. State ex rel. Dawson v. AkersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Winters v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Meek v. HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1998
  3. Shore v. Shell Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API