Legal Opinion
Maneely v. City of Newburgh
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 8, 2003No. 01 CIV. 2600(CM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND DECISION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Timothy Maneely represents a class of individuals suing the City of New-burgh and its police chief, William Bloom, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). Before me is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to whether the City of Newburgh maintained an unconstitutional policy of strip searching all pre-arraignment prisoners, with or without having reasonable suspicion to believe that those persons were carrying or concealing weapons or contraband.
For the following…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dodge v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Nilsen v. York CountyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- DeCastro v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Stein v. JanosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- S. Strauss, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 342District Court, E.D. New York · 2007