S. Strauss, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 342
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BIANCO, District Judge.
Plaintiff S. Strauss, Inc. (“Strauss”) seeks to stay an arbitration initiated by defendant United Food and Commercial Workers’ Union, Local 342 (the “Union”). For the reasons that follow, the Court denies plaintiffs motion to stay arbitration.
I. Background
The following facts are undisputed, unless otherwise noted.
A. The Instant Action
Strauss is a purveyor of meats and food-related products. (PL’s Pet-. ¶ 1.) The Union purports to represent certain employees of Strauss pursuant to several collective bargaining agreements entered into by the parties.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- P.R. Tel. Co. v. Worldnet Telecomm., Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014