Legal Opinion

S. Strauss, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 342

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 13, 2007No. 07-CV-2432 (JFB)(ETB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BIANCO, District Judge.

Plaintiff S. Strauss, Inc. (“Strauss”) seeks to stay an arbitration initiated by defendant United Food and Commercial Workers’ Union, Local 342 (the “Union”). For the reasons that follow, the Court denies plaintiffs motion to stay arbitration.

I. Background

The following facts are undisputed, unless otherwise noted.

A. The Instant Action

Strauss is a purveyor of meats and food-related products. (PL’s Pet-. ¶ 1.) The Union purports to represent certain employees of Strauss pursuant to several collective bargaining agreements entered into by the parties.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. P.R. Tel. Co. v. Worldnet Telecomm., Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API