Legal Opinion
Peele v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis Pecora, J.), entered March 10, 1989, which granted defendant Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff, who was injured while disembarking from a bus owned and operated by the New York City Transit Authority *603(NYCTA) subsequently served a summons and complaint upon defendant Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA), which is a corporate and distinct legal entity apart from NYCTA. (Rosas v Manhattan &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rosas v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nowinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Zaiman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Woods v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Delacruz v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Rodriguez v. SitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.