Legal Opinion
State v. Manson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 22, 2009No. AC 27561PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
“A defendant who moves to suppress identification evidence bears the initial burden of proving that the identification resulted from an unconstitutional procedure.” State v. Fullwood, 193 Conn. 238, 244, 476 A.2d 550 (1984). The principal issue in this criminal appeal is whether the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the victim’s pretrial identification, allegedly resulting from an unconstitutional photographic array procedure. We agree with the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion, and we affirm the judgment against the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. ArtisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.