Legal Opinion

Meade County Bank v. Bailey

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1902No. L.A. No. 1089PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

Plaintiff is a corporation organized and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of South Dakota. Action was brought in the superior court of Los Angeles County against the defendants, upon a judgment obtained against them in said state of South Dakota. The defendant Parsons, upon being served, appeared in said action December 1, 1900, and on the same day gave and served notice on the plaintiff demanding security for costs. Thereafter, December 20, 1900, the plaintiff applied to a judge of said court, without notice to said defendant, to fix the amount of the bond, and the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Buechold v. OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Kiesel v. District Court of Sixth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Sevier CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Straus v. StrausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API