Legal Opinion
Buechold v. Ortiz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1968No. Nos. 21472, 21473PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKER, District Judge:
The District Court dismissed these two cases without ah appearance by the appellees on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction to hear them, and granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis, pursuant to Section 1915 of Title 28 of the United States Code. This court has jurisdiction of the appeals under the provisions of Title 28, Section 1291, of the United States Code. The sole issue presented by both cases is whether a United States District Court has original jurisdiction of cases involving paternity and child support brought on behalf of a German citizen against a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Ohio Ex Rel. Popovici v. AglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- David A. Thompson v. Susan A. Thompson, AKA Susan A. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Mabel Smith Crouch v. Parsons Thomas CrouchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Russell A. Firestone, III and Myrna Odell Firestone v. The Cleveland Trust Company and Russell A. Firestone, Jr., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.