Legal Opinion

Committee to Save Lake Murray v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 26, 1975No. Nos. 73-2271, 73-2272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, Senior District Judge:

This case comes before the court upon the separate petitions of James E. Smith and The Committee to Save Lake Murray (hereafter called the Committee) to review an order of the Federal Power Commission (hereafter called the Commission), with one Commissioner dissenting, of September 10, 1973 approving the application of South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (hereafter called the Company) to grant an easement to the Watergate Partnership, a private real estate developer (hereafter called the Partnership). The appeal also challenged the Commission order of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. The Municipal Distributors Group v. Federal Power Commission, Brooks Gas Co., Inc., and Cities Service Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The Committee to Save Lake Murray, Etc. v. The Federal Power Commission, Watergate Partnership, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Intervenor. James E. Smith v. The Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Watergate Partnership, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API