Legal Opinion
The Committee to Save Lake Murray, Etc. v. The Federal Power Commission, Watergate Partnership, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Intervenor. James E. Smith v. The Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Watergate Partnership, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 26, 1975No. 73-2271Published
1Opinion of the Court
515 F.2d 379
169 U.S.App.D.C. 148
The COMMITTEE TO SAVE LAKE MURRAY, etc., Petitioner,
v.
The FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent,
Watergate Partnership, South Carolina Electric & Gas
Company, Intervenor.
James E. SMITH, Petitioner,
v.
The FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent,
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Watergate
Partnership, Intervenors.
Nos. 73-2271, 73-2272.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 16, 1975.
Decided June 26, 1975.
F. Glenn Smith, Columbia, S. C., for petitioners.
Arthur E. Gowran, Atty., F.P.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Pa., pro hac…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Municipal Distributors Group v. Federal Power Commission, Brooks Gas Co., Inc., and Cities Service Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Committee to Save Lake Murray v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975