Legal Opinion
The Municipal Distributors Group v. Federal Power Commission, Brooks Gas Co., Inc., and Cities Service Gas Company, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 27, 1972No. 24820PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:
The Municipal Distributors Group (MDG), eight small municipalities located in central Missouri, brings this petition for review 1 of two orders of the Federal Power Commission in their consolidated proceedings in Cities Service Gas Company, Docket Nos. CP67-340, et al. 2 We find that the Commission’s orders were based on substantial evidence in the administrative record, and were otherwise proper. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, we affirm those orders.
I. BACKGROUND AND COMMISSION ACTION
Cities Service Gas Company (Cities) is a natural gas pipeline company…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Telephone Users Ass'n v. Public Service Commission of District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Cities of Carlisle & Neola v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Committee to Save Lake Murray v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- The Committee to Save Lake Murray, Etc. v. The Federal Power Commission, Watergate Partnership, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Intervenor. James E. Smith v. The Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Watergate Partnership, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975