Legal Opinion
United States v. William W.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 13, 1993No. SA CR 92-53(A) AHSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON ORDER SANCTIONING ATTORNEY FOR GENDER-BASED DISCRIMINATION
STOTLER, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
On May 10, 1993, the government brought a Motion for a Penalty Pursuant to the Local Rules against attorney Frank Swan. The government seeks imposition of a monetary sanction and referral of this matter to the Standing Committee on Discipline for the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Mr. Swan filed opposition to the motion on May 21, 1993. The government filed its reply on May 28, 1993. After hearing the parties’ oral arguments on June 7,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- The Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California v. John M. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ramirez v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Jerry KenneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. WunschCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William Wunsch Beverly Wunsch Teri Lee Sowers, and Frank L. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Standing Committee on Discipline v. YagmanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
- United States v. WunschCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Vitko v. VitkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.