Legal Opinion
Standing Committee on Discipline v. Yagman
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 18, 1994No. CV 94-6448 ER, JGD, DWWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER THEREON
2Per curiam
On August 13 and September 10,1993, this three-judge panel conducted hearings on its Order to Show Cause why Respondent, attorney Stephen Yagman, should not be disciplined pursuant to the Local Rules of the Central District of California. The Panel has reviewed the evidence presented by the parties and the written arguments of counsel. In this order, the Panel finds that the Respondent violated Local Rule 2.5.2 by impunging the integrity of the court and by interfering with the random selection of judges. The Panel defers the determination…
3Cases cited31 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Standing Committee on Discipline v. YagmanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
- Fieger v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995