Legal Opinion
Wakefield v. Housel
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1923No. 6080PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
On January 23,- 1922, the District Court below found the plaintiff in error, S. E. Wakefield, “to be in contempt of this court as set forth in the certificate of facts of the said referee,” and ordered and adjudged “that he be committed by the United States marshal to the county jail of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma, for a period of six months from this date.” Wakefield sued out this writ of error to review the judgment against him, and has assigned many alleged errors in his trial and conviction, the chief of which is that he was thereby adjudged guilty and sentenced for a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re EskayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Eustace v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Golub v. GuzzardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Blackard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Frankford Trust Co. v. AllanoffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.