Legal Opinion

American Family Mutual Insurance v. Dobrzynski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1979No. 76-538PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, C. J.

The primary issue is whether the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to permit an inference of negligence on the part of the defendant under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. We believe there was sufficient evidence to permit the inference and reverse the judgment.

The incident giving rise to the action occurred on July 12, 1973 at about 2:15 a.m., in Cudahy, Wisconsin.

Gayle Clemens owned a 1970 Buick. It was insured by the plaintiff-appellant American Family Mutual Insurance Company. The other vehicle involved was a 1965 Ford Thunderbird owned and operated by the defendant-respondent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Household Utilities, Inc. v. Andrews Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dyback v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Reiter v. DykenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Magdalene M. Smoot and Ryan M. Smoot v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. And Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re Commitment of ArendsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API