Legal Opinion

United States v. Carr

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 15, 2006No. ACM 35772PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MATHEWS, Judge:

The appellant stands convicted of one specification of absence without leave, terminated by apprehension, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 886; one specification of dereliction of duty, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892; and seven specifications of indecent assault, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The appellant pled guilty to the Article 86 and 92, UCMJ, Charges and Specifications, and does not challenge them on appeal. He pled not guilty to the Article 134, UCMJ, Charge and Specifications, but guilty to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API