Legal Opinion
Skidmore v. Precision Printing & Packaging, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1999No. 98-40440PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Precision Printing & Packaging, Inc. (“Precision”) and its parent, An- heuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (“Anheu-ser-Busch”), appeal judgments against them for intentional infliction of emotional distress and violation of Title VII. Appellant Jay Mitchell appeals a judgment against him for intentional infliction of emotional distress. We vacate the judgment against Mitchell, reverse all judgments against Precision and Anheuser-Busch, and reverse the award of attorneys’ fees.
I. Background
Appellee Patricia Skidmore 1 began working for the Paris, Texas facility of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Lane v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Harvill v. Westward Communications, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Burleson v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.