People v. Armstrong
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed March 15, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Rennick, 123 AD3d 1146 [2014]; People v Reyes, 121 AD3d 820 [2014]; People v Coleman, 116 AD3d 708 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. RennickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HollowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. HollowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015