Legal Opinion
People v. Coleman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 2014PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed February 8, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Dillon, Balkin,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. BovianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.