Legal Opinion
People v. Rennick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 2014No. 2012-11473PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J), imposed November 30, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Rivera, Austin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. BovianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. HopkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.