Legal Opinion

James v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 9, 1981No. 1 CA-CIV 4947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.

This appeal concerns the liability of a dog owner for injuries received by a child as a result of being bitten by the dog. The jury returned a verdict for the dog owner and we affirm.

Appellant and his family visited the country home of appellee Charles Cox on January 17, 1976. At the time, appellant was three years old. Several of the adults present went into the house, leaving appellant outside in the yard. The adults heard appellant scream and when they reached him, they found that he apparently had been bitten on the face by a dog belonging to Mr. Cox.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Willey v. WhitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Nelson v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Dykeman v. AshtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weekly v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Murdock v. BalleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. DeForest v. DeForestCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Hartsock v. BandhauerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Massey v. ColaricArizona Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API