Legal Opinion
DeForest v. DeForest
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 24, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 7624PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Judge.
The primary issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering a decree of dissolution nunc pro tunc.
On February 27,1981, Truman V. DeForest (husband) filed a petition for dissolution of his marriage with Jeanne C. DeForest (wife). A default hearing was conducted on June 4, 1982 before the Honorable Cheryl K. Hendrix. The husband and counsel for both parties were present at the hearing. The agreement of the parties with respect to a property settlement was presented to the court. Judge Hendrix’ minute entry order provides:
Hearing on Default. Petitioner is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moss v. Central of Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shell Oil Co. v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- United States v. Nick SenakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Kooyenga v. Hertz Equipment Rentals, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- United States v. Daniel JudonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Phillips v. ClancyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Hernandez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Wollenberg v. Phoenix Leasing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Hernandez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Hernandez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2002