Hartsock v. Bandhauer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Judge.
In this dog bite case, the sole issue is the appropriateness of the court’s granting of the dog owner’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
Appellants Michael Hartsock, age seven and a half, and his parents lived next door to the appellee Renee Bandhauer in November 1986. Their backyards were separated by a common six-foot high wooden fence composed of vertical slats with horizontal railings. Appellee owns three dogs which she kept in her backyard. Michael and some friends were playing soccer in his front yard when one of his friends kicked Michael’s ball over the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, MdCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Jabczenski v. Southern Pacific Memorial Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Clarke v. EdgingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Barnhizer v. Paradise Valley Unified School District 69Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Hardin Developers, Inc. v. Corkran Ex Rel. CorkranKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Clea v. OdomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Becker v. LiuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- North Hardin Developers, Inc. v. Corkran Ex Rel. CorkranKentucky Supreme Court · 1992