Legal Opinion

Broyles v. Estate of Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1983No. TC A8103-01329, CA A25385, SC 29607PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*797JONES, J.

This case presents the question of the proper procedure and test to be used in deciding whether a penalty should be assessed under ORS 19.160 for pursuing an appeal without probable cause. The Court of Appeals allowed plaintiffs motion for the assessment of such a penalty. We affirm.

Plaintiff Broyles was injured when the car in which she was riding was hit by a car driven by Carroll Brown.1

At trial, where Broyles sought damages for her personal injuries, she testified during cross-examination as follows:

“Q. [by defense counsel] How long was it after the impact, the crash, that Mr.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Wells v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Murray Well-Drilling v. DeischCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fechtig v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Alderson v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Brian v. OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS COM'NOregon Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API