Broyles v. Estate of Brown
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*797JONES, J.
This case presents the question of the proper procedure and test to be used in deciding whether a penalty should be assessed under ORS 19.160 for pursuing an appeal without probable cause. The Court of Appeals allowed plaintiffs motion for the assessment of such a penalty. We affirm.
Plaintiff Broyles was injured when the car in which she was riding was hit by a car driven by Carroll Brown.1
At trial, where Broyles sought damages for her personal injuries, she testified during cross-examination as follows:
“Q. [by defense counsel] How long was it after the impact, the crash, that Mr.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Wells v. MorrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Murray Well-Drilling v. DeischCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Security State Bank v. LuebkeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Fechtig v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Alderson v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Brian v. OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS COM'NOregon Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.