Legal Opinion

Wolfgang Doerr v. Daniel Goldsmith / Cheryl Dobinski v. George O. Lockhart

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2015No. 17 / No. 66Published

1Opinion of the Court

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 17 Wolfgang Doerr, Respondent, v. Daniel Goldsmith, Defendant, Julie Smith, Appellant. --------------------------- No. 66 Cheryl Dobinski, Appellant, v. George O. Lockhart, et al., Respondents. Case No. 17: Scott T. Horn, for appellant. Dara Warren, for respondent. Case No. 66: Dennis J. Bischof, for appellant. Mark P. Della Posta, for respondents. MEMORANDUM: In Doerr v Goldsmith, the order of the Appellate Division should be…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API