Wolfgang Doerr v. Daniel Goldsmith / Cheryl Dobinski v. George O. Lockhart
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 17 Wolfgang Doerr, Respondent, v. Daniel Goldsmith, Defendant, Julie Smith, Appellant. --------------------------- No. 66 Cheryl Dobinski, Appellant, v. George O. Lockhart, et al., Respondents. Case No. 17: Scott T. Horn, for appellant. Dara Warren, for respondent. Case No. 66: Dennis J. Bischof, for appellant. Mark P. Della Posta, for respondents. MEMORANDUM: In Doerr v Goldsmith, the order of the Appellate Division should be…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.