Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Mustang Fuel Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1974No. 46185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

This appeal is from the trial court’s denial of a petition in intervention in an action in mandamus brought by Mustang Fuel Corporation (Mustang) to force the Board of Commissioners of McClain County (Board) to issue a permit to lay Mustang’s pipeline for approximately three-fourths of a mile under a county dirt road. The attempted intervenor (landowner) owns land adjacent to the county road in question.

The trial court, in finding that the landowner was not a necessary party to the mandamus action, stated:

“The court is of the opinion that any acts that might be done by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Commercial Nat. Bank v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Garvin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Transok Pipe Line Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Transok Pipe Line Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API