Legal Opinion · Dissent

Transok Pipe Line Co. v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1978No. 49638Published

1DissentSimms, Justice

I must respectfully dissent. Phillips Pet. Co. v. Corporation Commission, supra, does not support the majority’s refusal to enforce the provisions of 52 O.S.1971, § 10, against Transok.

The Court’s holding in Phillips that those statutory provisions (requiring a producer to make a portion of gas available to the landowner and authorizing the Corporation Commission to fix prices) were an invalid regulation under the police power which would constitute a taking as to Phillips, if enforced, was based on the fact that Phillips was not a public utility.

Transok is a public utility. The statutes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. Transok Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Barnes v. Transok Pipeline CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. In Re VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Anchor Stone and Materials Company v. CarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API