Transok Pipe Line Co. v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentSimms, Justice
I must respectfully dissent. Phillips Pet. Co. v. Corporation Commission, supra, does not support the majority’s refusal to enforce the provisions of 52 O.S.1971, § 10, against Transok.
The Court’s holding in Phillips that those statutory provisions (requiring a producer to make a portion of gas available to the landowner and authorizing the Corporation Commission to fix prices) were an invalid regulation under the police power which would constitute a taking as to Phillips, if enforced, was based on the fact that Phillips was not a public utility.
Transok is a public utility. The statutes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. Transok Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Barnes v. Transok Pipeline CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- In Re VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Anchor Stone and Materials Company v. CarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.