Legal Opinion
Braddock v. Madison County, Ind.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 30, 1998No. IP 96-1233-C H/GPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Introduction
Three court reporters and a former bailiff with the Unified Courts of Madison County seek additional compensation from Madison County, Indiana, for hours the plaintiffs worked beyond the minimum scheduled 35 hours a week each was expected to work. The case was tried to the court. Findings of fact and conclusions of law are set forth in this entry.
Plaintiffs seek relief under two radically different legal regimes: contract law and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). See 29 U.S.C. § 207 (FLSA overtime…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Newell v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- William Ellington v. City of East ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Villareal v. El Chile, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Conzo v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Koelker v. Mayor and City Council of CumberlandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.