Legal Opinion
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 19, 2011No. Civ. No. 07-272-SLRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 18, 2007, Intermec Technologies Corporation (“Intermec” or “plaintiff”) filed an action against Palm, Inc. (“Palm” or “defendant”) for infringement of five U.S. patents (“the Intermec patents”). (D.I. 1) In its third amended answer, Palm asserted infringement of Palm’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,665,803 (“the '803 patent”) and 7,096,049 (“the '049 patent”, collectively “the Palm patents”).
On September 14, 2010, 738 F.Supp.2d 522 (D.Del.2010), the court issued a memorandum opinion with respect to the Intermec patents (D.I. 284).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Brambles USA, Inc. v. BlockerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Federal Kemper Insurance Company v. Rauscher, Richard H. And Griffith, Robert and Griffith, Linda. Appeal of Robert and Linda GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Glendon Energy Co. v. Borough of GlendonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Max's Seafood Cafe, ex rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. QuinterosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Von Kahle Ex Rel. Professional Resources Systems International, Inc. v. Roemmele (In Re Roemmele)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- In re SellersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In re BurgerFi International, Inc., et al.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Pearson v. HodgsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021