Connor v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The appellant was charged in the first count of the indictment with distilling and in the .second cpunt with having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. He was found guilty as charged in the second count.
The evidence for the state tended to show that a complete copper still of 50 or 60 gallons capacity was found in a cellar under the shed of defendant’s smokehouse. There were also in the cellar six 30-gallon barrels of beer in a state of fermentation. The top of the cellar was floored with one inch plank, and there was a trapdoor in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hornsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Olden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Sampson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Russell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Allen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Brasher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.