Legal Opinion

Connor v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1923No. 4 Div. 885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The appellant was charged in the first count of the indictment with distilling and in the .second cpunt with having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. He was found guilty as charged in the second count.

The evidence for the state tended to show that a complete copper still of 50 or 60 gallons capacity was found in a cellar under the shed of defendant’s smokehouse. There were also in the cellar six 30-gallon barrels of beer in a state of fermentation. The top of the cellar was floored with one inch plank, and there was a trapdoor in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hornsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Olden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Sampson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Ayers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  3. Russell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Allen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Brasher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API