Brasher v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The written charges requested by defendant were all properly refused as stating incorrect propositions of law, or they were covered by the court’s oral charge and the written charges given at the request of defendant. Charges where acquittal is based upon supposition have been condemned. This is true of charge 5. Charge 11 was amply covered by the court’s oral charge. Charge 12 is not applicable except in cases of circumstantial evidence, and not then unless based upon a consideration of all the evidence. Charge 14 is abstract. Charge 15 is invasive of the province of the jury. Charge 17 has…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Connor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Henderson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bringhurst v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
- Anderson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Hannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Hopkins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
- Owen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931