Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State, in re Brooms v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 19, 1916PublishedCited by 25 opinions

. Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Application by the State of Alabama for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court, reversing and remanding the appeal of Hugh Brooms against the State, 15 Ala. App. 72 South. 691.

1Opinion of the CourtAndebson, C. J.

I think that the holding of the Court of Appeals is correct, and the writ should be denied. I think that, when an indictment contains several counts, there would be no election and proof, and a conviction can be had under each count. When, however, an indictment contains a single count and a single charge, there cannot be proof of but one offense, but if in a single count several offenses are charged in the alternative, or the same offense is alternatively charged as having been committed in different ways, there may be proof of each alternative, but after the state closes its evidence the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Deason v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Harrison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Abrams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API