Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wooten v. Bomar

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This suit is based on a petition for habeas corpus by plaintiff in error. The plaintiff in error was convicted of burglary with explosives under Section 39-906, T.C.A., and sentenced the minimum sentence under that Section to twenty-five (25) years in the State penitentiary. On appeal this conviction was affirmed, as is shown in the reported case in 203 Tenn. 473, 314 S.W.2d 1.

The petition herein is bottomed on the proposition that the Code Section on which the indictment in the first instance is based (sec. 39-906, T.C.A.) was impliedly repealed some two years before the indictment herein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wooten v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  2. United States v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  3. Ledger v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hobson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Ex Parte BaileyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Larry Jereller Alston, Kris Theotis Young, and Joshua Edward WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. AveryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017
  4. State v. TeasleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Long v. DuttonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API