Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. United States
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided July 5, 2017No. Cv. No. 17-02341; Cr. No. 99-20272PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Stephen Murray Mitchell’s pro se second or successive motion seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (the “Johnson § 2255 Motion”). ' (17-02341: ECF No. 1-1 at 3.1) Mitchell challenges his sentence in Criminal Case No. 99-20272,2 *999seeking relief under Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) (“Johnson”). The United States (the “Government”) has responded. (17-02341: ECF No. 6 at 22.) Mitchell has replied. (17-02341:' ECF No. 7 at 69.) With leave of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larry Cradler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Larry NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Curruthers v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Larry Cradler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018