Hollenback v. Tiffany
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 35, March T., 1912, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. Term, 1910, No. 5, dismissing bill in equity in case of Frank Hollenback v. A. E. Tiffany. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the maintenance of a fence. Before Edwards, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the decree of the court dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The facts found by the court below are substantially as follows: A block of lots in Carbondale, bounded on the north by Maple avenue, on the south by Copeland avenue, on the east by Birkett street, and on the west by Belmont street, was divided into equal sections so that the Delaware and Hudson Company owned the section or half block of lots fronting on Belmont street, and Joseph Birkett owned the section or half block of lots fronting *299on Birkett street, each abutting the other in the rear by a well-established line. Prior to 1894 Birkett subdivided his block into six…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schmoele v. BetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Saccone v. West End Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Mershon v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Carter v. LebzelterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Percy A. Brown & Co. v. RaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kanefsky v. Dratch Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Shore v. FriedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Kanefsky v. Dratch Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Mathues v. Providence Friends School, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978