Davis v. Deariso
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
1. In the absence of valid zoning regulations or restrictive covenants to the contrary, the right to use one’s property for lawful business purposes is to be protected by the law just as much as is the right to use one’s property for residential purposes, both being lawful purposes and being rights inherent in the ownership of the property. This court has consistently held, although in most instances by a divided bench, that a filling station in a residence neighborhood and in close proximity to residences does not constitute a nuisance per se, and that the proper operation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. KahnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Wilson v. Evans Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Rushing v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Thompson v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sikes v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- White v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Franklin v. Sing-Wilkes, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Carroll v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Rawls v. City of JonesboroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.