Legal Opinion

People v. Alexander

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1940No. Crim. 1730PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit murder, and from the judgment of conviction and the order denying a new trial, this appeal is taken. For reversal it is urged that the evidence is insufficient to justify a conviction of an assault with intent to commit murder; that the court erred in excluding certain evidence; in giving and refusing to give certain instructions, and in denying a new trial.

Inasmuch as appellant devotes considerable attention to the claim of insufficiency of the evidence it is necessary to set forth the evidence in some detail.

Appellant and Mrs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BerrymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. DukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. EmmeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. People v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Fournier SampedroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  2. People v. SipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. State v. BuchananIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Herbert's Laurel-Ventura Inc. v. Laurel Ventura Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API